Bug#1030882: RFS: dbus-c++/0.9.0-11 [QA] -- C++ API for D-Bus
Am 15.02.23 um 19:25 schrieb Thomas Uhle:
After reverting the split of the package libdbus-c++-1v5 into seperate packages and assuming the
other updates make their way into bookworm just in time, would it then make sense to wait until the
release of bookworm to prepare another revision of dbus-c++ with this remaining change targeted for
unstable or would it then also be required to upload to experimental at first?
No, you can wait after bookworm release date and directly go unstable.
Should I already change "UNRELEASED" into "unstable" in debian/changelog or shall I leave this as it
is?
Yes, please target unstable.
Reply to: