[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1021661: RFS: hashcash/1.22-1 [ITA] [RC] -- postage payment scheme for email based on hash calculations



Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> writes:

> One has to be owner to move a repo, so I could not.
> I have skipped that part and uploaded with your d/watch fix.

Thank you!  Would it be appropriate for me to

    # Note: 460b77bf748 is "Make debian/watch more resilient to change"
    git tag --sign -m "Debian release 1.22-1" debian/1.22-1 460b77bf748
    git push --tags origin

?

Also, I notice that it says "Build log checks report 1 warning" at:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/hashcash

When looking at the build logs here:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hashcash&arch=amd64&ver=1.22-1&stamp=1665849263&raw=0

The only thing I could find that did not look entirely right to me was
this:

gpgv: unknown type of key resource 'trustedkeys.kbx'
gpgv: keyblock resource
'/tmp/dpkg-verify-sig.Hnb_19Km/trustedkeys.kbx': General error
gpgv: Signature made Sat Oct 15 14:36:43 2022 UTC
gpgv:                using RSA key 406220C8B8552802378CCE411F5C7A8B45564314
gpgv:                issuer "bage@debian.org"
gpgv: Can't check signature: No public key
dpkg-source: warning: cannot verify signature ./hashcash_1.22-1.dsc

And this:

/<<BUILDDIR>>/hashcash_1.22-1_amd64-buildd.changes.new could not be
renamed to /<<BUILDDIR>>/hashcash_1.22-1_amd64-buildd.changes: Illegal
seek
Distribution field may be wrong!!!

Is any of this reason for concern?  Or is there anything else that I missed?


Reply to: