[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library



Hello Adam,

thanks for your review.


Am Mittwoch, dem 27.07.2022 um 04:26 +0200 schrieb Adam Borowski:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 04:53:52PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> >    Package name    : xbase64
> >    Version         : 3.1.2-14
> 
> >  xbase64 (3.1.2-14) unstable; urgency=medium
> >  .
> >    * Migrate to debhelper-compat 13:
> >      - debian/control: Add debhelper-compat (= 13).
> >      - Remove debian/compat.
> >      - Add usr/bin/xbase64-config into new debian/not-installed.
> >      - Add usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libxbase64.la to
> >          debian/libxbase64-bin.install.
> >    * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.1.0 (No changes
> > needed).
> >    * debian/copyright:
> >      - Add year 2022 to myself.
> >    * Disable Link time optimization (Closes: #1015707):
> >      - debian/rules: Add optimize=-lto to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS.
> >    * debian/control: Add Rules-Requires-Root: no.
> 
> Is there a reason you include the .la file?  From my experience it
> being
> needed for anything suggests severe borkage, and the Policy concurs:
> 
[...]

That was my mistake. I only paid attention to the messages from
dh_missing and installed the la file without thinking too much.

Once again, thank you for your advice.

The error is corrected and uploaded to git and mentors.

> 
> 
> Meow!

CU
Jörg


-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key        : 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54470 Lieser


git:      https://jff.email/cgit/

Threema: SYR8SJXB
Wire: @joergfringsfuerst
Skype: joergpenguin
Ring:     jff
Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst


My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: