Bug#996653: RFS: dynarmic/5+git20211012.cce7e4e+ds-1 [ITP] -- ARM
dynamic recompiler
Reply-To: Andrea Pappacoda <andrea@pappacoda.it>, 996653@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Andrea Pappacoda <andrea@pappacoda.it>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Mentors <package-sponsorship-requests@lists.debian.org>
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:51:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.996653.B996653.163770053117601@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 996653
X-Debian-PR-Package: sponsorship-requests
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
References: <163441391099.36123.13905777911146502970.reportbug@debian>
Received: via spool by 996653-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B996653.163770053117601
(code B ref 996653); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:51:01 +0000
Received: (at 996653) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2021 20:48:51 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2018-09-13) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DIGITS_LETTERS,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,
SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 134; neutral, 28; spammy, 1.
spammytokens:0.947-+--H*r:bugs.debian.org
hammytokens:0.000-+--H*x:geary, 0.000-+--H*UA:geary,
0.000-+--find_package, 0.000-+--amd64, 0.000-+--sk:git2021
Received: from mail.pappacoda.it ([185.229.237.153]:50632)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.92)
(envelope-from <andrea@pappacoda.it>)
id 1mpcig-0004U2-VJ
for 996653@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:48:51 +0000
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 21:48:39 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pappacoda.it;
s=20201218; t=1637700526;
bh=jEuzbp+XHMK2zX7MVk+I2TMNIkXUeEXd+vagT+6M1Vg=;
h=Date:From:Subject:To:From;
b=eWspjtSj8curyofW4elijlLT3nOo+sZb1smKIxqv4bxtBazmVG0xVvGkgXLtR9KF7
REdvDtr0FmKYZ8hKrRn3GlI57WwjDlYHPYtTdrDbD/39q2Itv8icfO8kKbAb54zJup
Dip3XIA/pEpA0PKmHL2kUXNiqKefqScKWt+QD32ukwRhJ0T+PW7l2oGdh8Y4w+kPF2
nE1PFooumigLXGkoo/uReu8oxhay09/7glLDoTDlivnw+71TJFsu3nojjMrH/Qqk3Y
MrhFqdwhJ6k24mQdGWyN/dfEJIx3OAuOWiGV6OH8lGvrMW8ZCtgLJNbwZLoPb6Xfqt
oPx4efbWlW0YA==
From: Andrea Pappacoda <andrea@pappacoda.it>
To: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>, 996653@bugs.debian.org
Message-Id: <3TL13R.6BUXXH76O1P72@pappacoda.it>
X-Mailer: geary/40.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:13:10 +0100 Andrea Pappacoda
<andrea@pappacoda.it> wrote:
> > FTBFS on arm64:
>
> This makes me think that arm64 host support is still incomplete.
Until
> it released as stable by upstream, I think it's better to disable
arm64
> builds.
Or maybe not. Some build issues are probably related to the fact that
libzydis-dev does not depend on libzycore-dev while it should - this
causes Dynarmic to FTBFS also on amd64. Also, libxbyak-dev pre-6.00-2
had a small issue that made it impossible to make it discoverable
through CMake's find_package(). I've uploaded a fixed zydis revision
(-3) on Mentors, and tomorrow I'll also work on Dynarmic and arm64.
Reply to: