Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation

[Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>]

Am 28.10.21 um 14:26 schrieb Leon Marz:
> On 10/27/21 9:38 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > Hi Leon,
> >
> > The package seems to be okay except for the debian/copyright file. Just by looking at 
> > the debdiff (excluding the unchanged upstream sources) I can identify several files with 
> > additional copyright holders. Also, some files are GPL-2-only, which are not okay to 
> > publish under the general GPL-2+ that is assumed for *.
>
> Quick Question: How can I determine if a file is GPL-2-only or GPL-2+?
>
> Is it the phrase "Free use of this software is granted under the terms
> of the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2)."?

That is correct. If there is a license header in a file with the GPL version specified and 
it does not say "or later" or has a plus (+) after the GPL version then one has to assume 
that only that specific version applies.