Bug#981982: RFS: codelite/15.0+dfsg-1 [QA] -- Powerful and lightweight IDE
Hi Tobi,
Many thanks for your review.
>(Note: Due to the freeze, an upload to unstable is currently out of scope. You
>might either want to wait for bullseye's release or target experimental for
>now)
I know. The new release and RFS preceded the freeze, but didn't attract a
sponsor in time. I'll wait for bullseye.
>Thanks for the updated package…
>Some questions though:
>- d/control:
> - I see in the diff
> - that you start Depend: on clangd and clang-format.
> Is codelite _really_ depending as in Policy-Depends on it?
It's long enough ago that I can't remember, but I'll check.
> (there are some *arch-dependent* Build-Depends on clang stugg that seems to
> be in contradiction… as the Depends are not arch-depenent this does not fit
> somehow…)
> - note this change is not documented in d/changelog, thats why I had to
> guess: PLEASE document the _whys_ of your changes to help the sponsor out
> until they improve in reading your mind… ;-)
Sorry, that was an oversight.
>nitpick:
> - d/copyright does not need all those extra blank lines :)
>
>PS: You know the package is orphaned :) Could we talk you into adopting it?
>(Its okay if you decline, but TIA for considering!)
I know, and 40 or 50 years ago I'd have jumped at the chance. But codelite
really deserves a long term maintainer, and that excludes me.
>Tagging moreinfo because of the questions above (clang and freeze)
>Remove the tag when you think the package is ready for a second review…
Will do. Thanks again.
Regards,
David
Reply to: