Bug#959892: RFS: awf-gtk3/2.0.0-3 [ITP] -- A widget factory is a theme preview application for GTK
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Fabrice,
I've took an look at that group of awf-gtk[234] package and notice that they
all build from the same source.
Therefore it should be the goal to only have one source package and compile the
flavours from the same source;
debhelper principally support it to compile the source multiple times, however,
I dont know whether the differen gtk versions cam be installed simultaneously.
(IOW if the build-dependencies libtk-(2|3|4)-dev can be coninstalled and you
can select them in your configure.ac accordingly.)
This has several advantages:
- no source package duplication-
- less single debian packaging efforts.
- less work for ftp masters and other teams.
Please check if that would be generally possible and reply to this bug; then we
can decide how to proceed.
Cheers,
tobi
On Wed, 6 May 2020 19:52:15 +0200 Fabrice Creuzot <code@luigifab.fr> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "awf-gtk3"
>
> * Package name : awf-gtk3
> Version : 2.0.0-3
> Upstream Author : Fabrice Creuzot <code@luigifab.fr>
> * URL : https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended
> * License : GPL-3+
> * Vcs : https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended
> Section : x11
>
> A widget factory is a theme preview application for GTK. It displays the
> various widget types provided by GTK in a single window allowing to see
> the visual effect of the applied theme.
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> awf-gtk3 - A widget factory is a theme preview application for GTK
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/awf-gtk3
>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/awf-gtk3/awf-gtk3_2.0.0-3.dsc
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * Initial debian package release (Closes: #959436)
>
> Regards,
> Thank you
>
>
Reply to: