Bug#979394: RFS: dhcpcd-ui/0.7.8-1 [QA] -- GTK+ frontend for dhcpcd and wpa_supplicant
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcpcd-ui":
* Package name : dhcpcd-ui
Version : 0.7.8-1
Upstream Author : Roy Marples <roy@marples.name>
* URL : https://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd-ui
* License : BSD-2
* Vcs : [fill in URL of packaging vcs]
Section : net
It builds those binary packages:
dhcpcd-common - Common files for dhcpcd frontends
dhcpcd-gtk - GTK+ frontend for dhcpcd and wpa_supplicant
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/dhcpcd-ui/
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dhcpcd-ui/dhcpcd-ui_0.7.8-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
dhcpcd-ui (0.7.8-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* New upstream release.
* Added debian/gbp.conf.
* Deleted debian/compat.
* Added debian/upstream/metadata.
* Added debian/NEWS.dhcpcd-ui.
* Added d/dhcpcd-common.install, d/dhcpcd-gtk.install to split each binary
into its own package.
* Fixes to mostly unusable as some icons are missing. (Closes: #952394)
* debian/control:
- Set Debian QA Group as maintainer. (See #770081)
- Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.1.
- Updated debhelper to debhelper-compat to version 13.
- Updated homepage field.
- Added 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' to source stanza.
- Added dhcpcd-common binary for commons files between gtk.
- Replace build-deps to gtk3. (Closes: #967311)
* debian/watch:
- Bumped version of 3 to 4.
- Updated URL to a secure link reported by Lintian.
- Updated URL to import tarball of latest version.
* debian/copyright:
- Updated year upstream author.
- Updated source field.
- Updated file following DEP-5.
- Added files debian/* and people involved with year of contribution.
- Added myself.
* debian/rules:
- Use debhelper's dpkg-buildflags support to picking up hardening flags.
- Added override to install archive debian/NEWS.dhcpcd-ui.
Regards,
--
Leandro Cunha
Reply to: