[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#959013: RFS: gnome-maps/3.30.3.1-0+deb10u1 [NMU] -- map application for GNOME



On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 03:54:59 +0100 Phil Wyett <philip.wyett@kathenas.org
> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-maps"
> 
>  * Package name    : gnome-maps
>    Version         : 3.30.3.1-0+deb10u1
>    Upstream Author : maps-list@gnome.org
>  * URL             : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Maps
>  * License         : GPL-2+
>  * Vcs             : https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-maps
>    Section         : gnome
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
>   gnome-maps - map application for GNOME
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnome-maps
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
> command:
> 
>   dget -x 
> 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-maps/gnome-maps_3.30.3.1-0+deb10u1.dsc
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
>    * Non-maintainer upload
>    * New upstream release
>      - Make the shape layer renderer use the tile size specified in
the
> dynamic
>        service file, fixing an issue with misaligned shape layer
> (GeoJSON, GPX,
>        KML) rendering with the new 512 pixel tile
>      - Update Icelandic translation
> 
> ===
> 
> Note: Package requires sponsor for stable updates upload.
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947464
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil
> 

Hi all,

Bump. Anyone fancy sponsoring with a stable release imminent?

This RFS has been additionally mailed to the gtk-gnome list and the
gnome maintainers with zero replies/interaction to date.

Regards

Phil

-- 

*** Playing the game for the games sake. ***

WWW: https://kathenas.org

Twitter: @kathenasorg

IRC: kathenas

GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: