Bug#963674: RFS: smbldap-tools/0.9.11-1 [QA] -- smbldap-tools - Scripts to manage Unix and Samba accounts stored on LDAP
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smbldap-tools"
* Package name : smbldap-tools
Version : 0.9.11-1
Upstream Author : SATOH Fumiyas <fumiyas at OSS Technology Corp., Japan>
* URL : https://github.com/fumiyas/smbldap-tools
* License : GPL-2+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/smbldap-tools
Section : admin
It builds those binary packages:
smbldap-tools - Scripts to manage Unix and Samba accounts stored on LDAP
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/smbldap-tools
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smbldap-tools/smbldap-tools_0.9.11-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* QA upload.
* New upstream release. (Closes: #692530, #906108, #906109)
* debian/clean: created to clean build artifacts.
* debian/control:
- Added 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' to source stanza.
- Added Homepage field.
- Added Vcs-* fields.
- Removed redundant 'quilt' dependency from Build-Depends field.
- Removed unnecessary Build-Depends-Indep field.
* debian/copyright:
- Updated Source field to point to the repository of the last active
maintainer. Thanks to Daniele Palumbo <build-jessie-amd64@retaggio.net>
and to SATOH Fumiyas <fumiyas at OSS Technology Corp., Japan>. (Closes:
#906106)
- Updated upstream address.
- Using GitHub repository issues in Upstream-Contact field.
* debian/patches/0003_include_config_script.patch: no longer needed, as
upstream solved the problem. Deleted.
* debian/rules:
- Added a dh_auto_configure override to run build/autogen.sh before
dh_auto_configure.
- Removed useless DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS export.
* debian/salsa-ci.yml: added to provide CI tests for Salsa.
* debian/upstream/metadata: created.
* debian/watch:
- Bumped to version 4.
- Updated the source address.
Regards,
--
David da Silva Polverari
Reply to: