[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#961738: RFS: dragengine/1.1 -- Drag[en]gine Game Engine



On 5/31/20 9:19 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 06:55:42PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:
>> On 5/30/20 4:45 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
>>> I see those options:
>>> - talk to the fox-1.6 maintainer about updating the package to 1.7.
>>>   (though I see that they generally stick to released versions and 1.7.* seems
>>>   to be only development snapshots; a question to ask: is the 1.7 ABI stable already?)
>>> - make the features optional that requires 1.7
>>> - use only 1.6 features (listed for completeness, as you said you can't)
> There is another option I've forgot to mention:
> - Talk to the maintainers of 1.6 and work together with them to package
>   1.7.  Maybe Florian is happy to get you as (co-)maintainer the 1.7
>   package, so you could offer that.
>
> It seems at first glance possible that both versions can be in Debian,
> however, the release/security team will not be happy to have both of
> them in a stable release, IOW, having two versions can only be a
> intermediate solution until all reverse dependencies of 1.6* have been
> updated (by patching the respective Debian packages.) More about such
> library transision:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
>
> If you want to follow this route, your next step would be now to contact
> the fox1.6 maintainer by filing a wishlist bug against src:fox1.6, asking
> to package the version you need, explaining the situation and maybe (==
> if you want) tell them that you would commit helping to offset the extra
> work caused by maintaining the development snapshot.
>
> * dak spits out those r-deps:
> ace: libfox-1.6-dev
> gogglesmm: libfox-1.6-dev
> libgwenhywfar: libfox-1.6-dev
> pcsc-cyberjack: libfox-1.6-dev
> sumo: libfox-1.6-dev
> xfe: libfox-1.6-dev (>= 1.6.45)
>
FOX-1.7 and FOX-1.6 are not compatible (well, mostly yes but in
important things not). That said they are different libraries with
separate include and library names (/usr/include/fox-1.6 vs
/usr/include/fox-1.7 and the same for libraries). So technically
applications linking against FOX-1.6 do not have to be change if FOX-1.7
is added on the same system (the two can coexist). But it depends if two
library versions of the same library are accepted even if they are disjoint.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Plüss Roland

Game Development and Game Engine Technologies https://dragondreams.ch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: