[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#949604: RFS: 2048/0.0.0-1~exp1 -- Simple number game for the text console



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "2048"

 * Package name    : 2048
   Version         : 0.0.0-1~exp1
   Upstream Author : Maurits van der Schee <maurits@vdschee.nl>
 * URL             : https://github.com/mevdschee/2048.c
 * License         : MIT
 * Vcs             : https://github.com/kokoye2007/2048.c
   Section         : games

It builds those binary packages:

  2048 - Simple number game for the text console

As you may already know, 2048 is a fun puzzle game in which
you have to move the number tiles across the board. If two
tiles with the same value touch, they merge and their values
add up. The goal is to have a tile with the value 2048.

2048 is a really fun and popular game. Being a game, no other
packages depend on it. There is another package that does the
same thing, called 2048-qt, but it is a graphical version, and
this version is text-mode. It is much more lightweight, it depends
only on libc.

its RFP 767414 [1]

you can test  with 2048_0.0.0-1~exp1.dsc [2]

* fix make file
* add Manpage Section 6
* metadata
* signkey
* 0.0.0-1~exp1 Version
* RFP  #767414

2048 is available on QT with 2048-qt[3] and Gnome with gnome-2048[4]

This package is terminal single library.

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/2048

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/2/2048/2048_0.0.0-1~exp1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * Initial release (Closes: #767414)

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767414
[2] https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/2/2048/2048_0.0.0-1~exp1.dsc
[3] https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/2048-qt
[4] https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/gnome-2048

Regards,

Reply to: