[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#939886: review



I have done 
1) copyright file, maybe its cache.
Files: *
Copyright: 2015 jmoon018
License: LGPL-3.0+

Files: debian/*
Copyright: 2020 kokoye2007 <kokoye2007@gmail.com>
License: LGPL-3.0+

2) i change 

Upstream-Contact: kokoye2007 <kokoye2007@gmail.com>

3) change permission 

drwxr-xr-x 2 kokoye2007 kokoye2007 4096 Sep  9 20:15 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 kokoye2007 kokoye2007 4096 Jan 13 20:44 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007  422 Sep  9 20:15 map0.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007  394 Sep  9 20:15 map1.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007  219 Sep  9 20:15 map2.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007  684 Sep  9 20:15 map3.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007 1450 Sep  9 20:15 map4.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007  460 Sep  9 20:15 map5.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007  974 Sep  9 20:15 map6.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007  342 Sep  9 20:15 map7.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007 1153 Sep  9 20:15 map8.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 kokoye2007 kokoye2007  190 Sep  9 20:15 map9.txt

i am happy with that

thank you so much


On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 8:31 PM Kyle Robbertze <paddatrapper@debian.org> wrote:
On 2020/01/13 15:50, Ko Ko Ye` wrote:
> upload is success.

Great

>
>
> we have watch file warning.

You need to update the watch file to point to upstream's releases. See
https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#GitHub

>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/pacvim

Your copyright statement in debian/copyright needs to be as follows:

2015 Jamal Moon

This is how it is listed in the source code that you are distributing
and a requirement of the LGPL licence. Also you are not the upstream
contact as listed in debian/copyright, so please update that accordingly
too.

The map{0-9}.txt files are still executable:

> W: pacvim: executable-not-elf-or-script usr/share/pacvim-maps/map0.txt

Cheers
Kyle

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Kyle Robbertze
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://wiki.debian.org/KyleRobbertze


--

Reply to: