Bug#930595: RFS: uacme/1.0.15-2 [ITP]
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 12:17:35AM +0200, Nicola Di Lieto wrote:
> Long term I will try to migrate to asciidoctor as suggested. However I
> found another relevant debian bug that can be solved by depending on
> docbook-xsl
I have not a clue about asciidoc nor asciidoctor -- and especially, I'm not
aware about what the time frame for asciidoc removal is supposed to be.
> > This allows this package to be built in build environments which do not
> > allow general network access (xsltproc was not able to resolve xsl for
> > docbook locally so was retrieving them from the Internet).
>
> so please try again if you don't mind...
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uacme/uacme_1.0.16-5.dsc
Oif. Still:
a2x: ERROR: "xsltproc" --stringparam callout.graphics 0 --stringparam navig.graphics 0 --stringparam admon.textlabel 1 --stringparam admon.graphics 0 "/etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl/manpage.xsl" "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/uacme.1.xml" returned non-zero exit status 127
Full log: http://ix.io/1Myy
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Packager's rule #1: upstream _always_ screws something up. This
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ is true especially if you're packaging your own project.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
Reply to: