[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#929467: RFS: tfortune-1.0.0 [ITP]



On Thu, Jun 06, 12:56, Adam Borowski wrote

> > > The RFS and ITP are unrelated.
> > 
> > IDGI. For an RFS email one needs to provide the source package with
> > a debian/ directory, correct? If so, the debian/changelog file must
> > contain a line of the form
> > 
> > 	* Initial Release. Closes: #929467
> > 
> > But the number will only be assigned after the mail has been sent.
> > What am I missing here?
> 
> You file ITP stating you intend to work on package X.
> 
> Once you're done, you file a RFS.

I see, will keep this in mind for the next submission.

> > OK. Do you think it makes sense to provide another package which
> > installs a few tagged epigrams in, say, /usr/share/games/tfortunes
> > and make tfortune fall back to this directory if ~/.tfortune does
> > not exist?
> 
> That'd be nice.
> 
> What about tfortune-data that ships as many good epigrams as you have,
> that's Recommended: by tfortune?

Sounds good. I've merged and pushed out the t/debian branch so
that current master corresponds to what you have uploaded. I'll come
back to you when the tfortune-data package is ready.

Thanks
Andre
-- 
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology
Max-Planck-Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. Phone: (+49) 7071 601 829
http://people.tuebingen.mpg.de/maan/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: