On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 08:57:35AM +0200, Dashamir Hoxha wrote: > I have not ignored any remarks. But a stupid question cannot have a cleaver > answer. erm… > If you are the one who makes the final decisions on Debian, then I have no > choice > but to accept your decision. But my impression is that there is no central > authority > on Debian, and a new package proposal needs just a single sponsor in order > to be accepted. Erm… You are wrong on your "impression", and I encourage you to verify your facts before sending mails to the world. *There is* an authority on the archive: that would be the ftp-masters, who can one-sidedly decide whether a package can stay in the archive. > So, I am just going to be patient until someone sponsors it. > And meanwhile I will try to avoid any stupid questions or stupid people. I find you attitude in this single email (as well in the others, but I read with enough attention only this one), very, *very* counterproductive (en_GB reading), and I urge you to change your tone if you plan on interacting with the project. And for you information, it's very rare that once a DD says a package is no good, a random other DD oversteps the former and goes ahead uploading it. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature