[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#902949: RFS: elpy/1.22.0-1



Hi Chris,

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 09:54:44AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 902949 + pending
> thanks
> 
> Hi Nicholas,
> 
> >   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/elpy/elpy_1.22.0-1.dsc
> 
> elpy_1.22.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded.
>

Thank you for sponsoring :-)

> FYI:
> 
>  * No need for "[ Nicholas D Steeves ]" sections if you are the only
>    person in the changelog.

Ah, sorry, that was an oversight due to carelessness--I've been
working on a lot of collaborative packages and have been leaning
heavily on gbp dch -a.

>  * wrong-section-according-to-package-name lintian warning.

Yes, when lintian downgraded this warning to informational in
lintian/2.5.69, I talked with Emacsen team members Sean and David
(Sean is also a member of the Policy Team) about how much latitude a
packager has in defining his/her package's section.  For a similar
case, Magit has section vcs, which I agree is more precise and
discoverable than section lisp.  Consequently I filed a section change
request for Elpy in Bug #900212 and made the change in d/control for
elpy/1.21.0-1.

Cheers,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: