Bug#897238: Re: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS
On Sat, 2018-05-19 at 10:55 +0000, Lumin wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:49:05PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if the simplest solution is to just have
> > intel-mkl Depends: libblas. i.e. use policy to simply prevent a
> > sole
> > mkl installation.
> >
> > That way, the mkl alternative will always have a free BLAS to press
> > it's preference against.
>
> That's exactly a part of the present implementation.
>
> It depends on libblas3 | libblas.so.3, and enhances libblas.so.3, but
> never provides libblas.so.3 . Similar for lapack.
It's come together well then. Thanks for your efforts on it, Lumin.
Reply to: