On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 06:12:38PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:06:19 +0100 > From: Sven Hoexter <sven@timegate.de> > To: Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>, 891996-done@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#891996: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4-1 [I maintain the > package] > User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) > > > Hi Nicholas, > since I did not see any action by someone else I've just uploaded > it to unstable. I think folks committed to use btrfs engage with the toolchain > more then people like me, who's still riding on this boring ext4. ;) > > Sven Hi Sven, Thank you for uploading! I totally understand riding on boring ext4, and it's what I still recommend for friends, family, and colleagues (especially for laptops) :-) I wonder if ext4 will gain metadata checksums by default before XFS gains ext4's reputation for resiliency to powerloss and memory bitflips? I hope btrfs soon stabilizes to the point where it can be recommended as a general purpose default...with a wiki page more along the lines of "use it, it works" than "here are all the things that could go wrong, and how to work around them". Cheers, Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature