Processed: RFS: parcimonie/0.10.3-2

To: Nicolas Braud-Santoni <nicolas@braud-santoni.eu>
Cc: pkg-privacy-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, package-sponsorship-requests@lists.debian.org
Subject: Processed: RFS: parcimonie/0.10.3-2
From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 23:27:06 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.B.151286178511275.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 20171209232256.GA21781@bogus> <[🔎] 20171209232256.GA21781@bogus>

Processing control commands:

> block 883975 by -1
Bug #883975 [parcimonie] parcimonie should not depend on gnupg2 (transitional package)
883975 was not blocked by any bugs.
883975 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 883975: 883978
> tag 883975 + pending
Bug #883975 [parcimonie] parcimonie should not depend on gnupg2 (transitional package)
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
883975: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883975
883978: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883978
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#883978: RFS: parcimonie/0.10.3-2
  - From: Nicolas Braud-Santoni <nicolas@braud-santoni.eu>

Prev by Date: Bug#883978: RFS: parcimonie/0.10.3-2
Next by Date: Processed: severity of 883978 is normal
Previous by thread: Bug#883978: RFS: parcimonie/0.10.3-2
Next by thread: Bug#883978: marked as done (RFS: parcimonie/0.10.3-2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread