Em sex, 2017-10-20 às 13:41 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu: > Looks like it's wrong: > The only point in writing "any-amd64 any-i386" instead of "amd64 i386 x32" > (it's pretty unobvious any-amd64 includes x32 but it does) would be to allow > non-linux architectures like kfreebsd-* or hurd-*. But, the build on these > failed because of <linux/joystick.h> which make it pretty obvious this > version has no support for non-linux. I don't know whether making it work > is a matter of a simple #ifdef or something with more effort. You are right, I will change the part of the architectures in 'd/control'. In non-linux architectures, unfortunately I do not know how to solve it because the joystick will not work in the emulator. :( > Also, was the package actually broken on non-x86? (Beside failing to build > on 32-bit ARM because of QT's gles brain damage.) The emulator uses qt5 with "OpenGL" and in the armel/armhf architectures it only works in "GLES", for that reason I could not solve this problem. > > When uploading, I assumed the Architecture: line changes came from at least > rudimentary testing, but I see this was not the case. Thus, could you > please tell us what was the reason? The emulator worked fine on the linux architectures, so I put the 'd/control' any-amd64 any-i386. I can even change this to see if it will accept other architectures. Thanks! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao] ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780 ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part