Bug#833193: marked as done (RFS: chapel/1.15.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:20:09 +0000
with message-id <E1dsyy1-00030s-7A@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: chapel/1.15.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #833193,
regarding RFS: chapel/1.15.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
833193: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833193
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "chapel-minimal"
* Package name : chapel-minimal
Version : 1.13.1-1
Upstream Author : Ben Albrecht <balbrecht@cray.com>
* URL : chapel.cray.com
* License : Apache
Section : devel
It builds those binary packages:
chapel-minimal - Minimal compiler for the Chapel programming language
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/chapel-minimal
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chapel-minimal/chapel-minimal_1.13.1-1.dsc
More information about Chapel can be obtained from chapel.cray.com or https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel .
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #831437 )
Other notes:
I am an upstream author. The trivial spelling errors pointed out by lintian have been fixed upstream and will be included in the 1.14 release (in October 2016).
Regards,
Ben Albrecht
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package chapel has been removed from mentors.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: