Bug#862930: RFS: node-big-integer/1.6.22-1 [ITP]
Do not know depends if it is easy to patch depends
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Pierre Rudloff <pierre@rudloff.pro> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry, I was on vacation.
>
> node-bn is indeed a very similar library. Should we abandon the
> node-big-integer package then?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Le 26/08/2017 à 16:38, roucaries bastien a écrit :
>>
>> Does node-bn does the same ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
>> <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
>>> <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure what you mean.
>>>>> These are dev dependencies, they are used by big-integer developers to
>>>>> perform various development tasks, but they are not required to simply
>>>>> use the library so there is no point in packaging them in Debian.
>>>>> And they are *not* embedded in the package, they only appear in
>>>>> package.json.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> this makes sense, thanks.
>>>> So the review goes to the next step.
>>>> 1) licenses are missing (even if not used in the binary package, the
>>>> copyright
>>>> should list all the licenses in the source code).
>>>> 2) please use the same copyright as upstream for Debian packaging, this
>>>> will make
>>>> patch upstreaming possible without having to explicitly relicense them
>>>
>>> ping
>>>
>>> G.
>>>>
>>>> G.
>>>>
>>>>
>
Reply to: