Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash/4.3.2493-1 [ITP] -- IBM Data Engine for NoSQL Software Libraries

[Rodrigo <rosattig@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Hi Andrey,

We changed some things based on the points you made. I uploaded the 
package again to mentors.debian, here is the link to the .dsc file -> 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2518-1.dsc

Regarding the shared libs, they are installed together in the cxlflash 
package, so they'll all be sync'd in the build process. Besides, we 
commit to never change a shared library published interface in a way it 
breaks the binary compatibility, so any binary can work with any shared 
lib version.

> Maintainer and Uploaders contain the same mpvageli@us.ibm.com email.
> Priority should be optional.
> Current Standards-Version is 4.0.1.
> Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
> Why do you explicitly B-D on GCC 5?
> Why do you B-D on libudev1 and libcxl1?
> Why Vcs-Git but no Vcs-Browser?
> Vcs-Git gives 404.
> Please don't set DH_VERBOSE=1 and DH_OPTIONS=-v.
> Please remove commented out sample lines from debian/rules.
> Why are you running dh_install in override_dh_auto_install?
> Why is override_dh_gencontrol needed?
> override_dh_installdeb looks ugly and problematic.
> Maintainer scripts don't have debhelper markers.
> Why are you skipping dh_testroot?
> debian/source/include-binaries lists files that don't exist, doesn't it?
> How are you going to handle soname changes if you ship shared libs in a
> non-lib package?



Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao