Control: retitle -1 RFS: lirc/0.10.0-2 On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:32:55PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > > Why does the report title say "NMU"? > > Perhaps it shouldn't - large parts of the debian workflow is still a mystery > for me. Please read https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu If you are the package maintainer you don't do NMUs, but plain uploads. > > How are those two upstream bugs fixed? > > They was fixed by the experimental 0l.10.0-rc3 upstream release, which > eventually became 0.10.0 by upstream and pushed to sid as 0.10.0-1. This > should have been mentioned in -1, but was not, hence the -1 note. If they are fixed in an old version, why are they mentioned in this upload entry? Please read https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch06.en.html#bpp-debian-changelog > > I haven't looked at the package itself, but wtf is happening in prerm? > Removing files not owned by the package any more (but left on install to > niot remove anything user-edited). Why are they not owned by the package? Obsolete conffiles should be removed by dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile. I've also noticed the priority: extra field, which means when you updated Standards-Version to 4.0.1 in the previous upload you haven't actually consulted https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature