[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#870189: marked as done (RFS: pytest-qt/2.1.2-2)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:53:29 +0200
with message-id <d3cf4f73-41c2-6b34-a4b9-eece0e6d6f03@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: pytest-qt/2.1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #870189,
regarding RFS: pytest-qt/2.1.2-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
870189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name    : pytest-qt
  Version         : 2.1.2-2
  Upstream Author : Bruno Oliveira
* URL             : https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-qt
* License         : Expat
  Section         : python

Please check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/pytest-qt.git

Changes since the last upload:

  * Drop autopkgtests for PySide.
    Reason: PySide is not available for Python 3.6
  * Mark doc package M-A foreign
  * Run the tests at build time

Regards,
Ghis

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 18:40:33 +0300 Al Nikolov <clown@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Ghislain.
> 
> Please see [1] for an RFS bug template.
> 
> [1]https://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto
> 
> What is still missing in your report, is the link to the published
> package itself you want to be sponsored.
> 
> It should lead essentially to the `.dsc` file (m.d.n lists them
> automatically if you upload there). Mentioning "it can be build with
> gdb" is not enough and cloning Git repository in order to simply build
> a package is a nuisance. Both put unnecessary restrictions on the
> sponsorship process.

I agree, but since I need it I sponsored it anyway.
Having it to mentors is indeed handier for us

G.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: