On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:36:03AM -0700, Ian A Mason wrote: > Andrey, > > We do not see any lintian warnings: > > > dpkg-deb: building package 'libpoly-dev' in > '../libpoly-dev_1.4-1_amd64.deb'. > dpkg-deb: building package 'libpoly0' in '../libpoly0_1.4-1_amd64.deb'. > dpkg-deb: building package 'libpoly-dbg' in > '../libpoly-dbg_1.4-1_amd64.deb'. > dpkg-genbuildinfo > dpkg-genchanges >../libpoly0_1.4-1_amd64.changes > dpkg-genchanges: info: including full source code in upload > dpkg-source --after-build libpoly > dpkg-buildpackage: info: full upload (original source is included) > Now running lintian... > Finished running lintian. > > > So I am confused by your comments. My comments mostly aren't about lintian, but you need to run lintian with -IE --pedantic against libpoly0_1.4-1_amd64.changes: X: libpoly0 source: debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package libpoly-dbg I: libpoly0 source: duplicate-short-description libpoly0 libpoly-dev libpoly-dbg W: libpoly0 source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.8 (current is 4.0.0) I: libpoly0 source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing I: libpoly0 source: debian-watch-file-is-missing P: libpoly-dbg: no-upstream-changelog P: libpoly-dev: no-upstream-changelog I: libpoly-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short I: libpoly0: hardening-no-bindnow usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpoly.so.0.1.4 P: libpoly0: no-upstream-changelog I: libpoly0: extended-description-is-probably-too-short -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature