Bug#862940: RFS: slick-greeter/1.0.3-1 ITP

[Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>]

Control: tags -1 +moreinfo

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:59:28AM +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slick-greeter"
> 
>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>    * Initial release. (Closes: #862934)

Alas, it fails to build when build-dependencies are restricted to the first
alternative listed, such as sbuild's default -- which is also used on
official buildds.

There's no package named liblightdm-gobject-1-dev anywhere in Debian -- you
need to put liblightdm-gobject-dev first.

> Please let me know if experimental is perhaps more appropriate than
> unstable given the status of Stretch.

For new packages, unstable is fine.  In fact, assuming you believe the
package to be in a releasable shape, unstable is better as this way we won't
have to migrate the package.


Meow!
-- 
Don't be racist.  White, amber or black, all beers should be judged based
solely on their merits.  Heck, even if occasionally a cider applies for a
beer's job, why not?
On the other hand, corpo lager is not a race.