[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#861772: RFS: writeroom-mode/3.6.1-1 [ITP]



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Control: block -1 by 861705

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "writeroom-mode"

 * Package name    : writeroom-mode
   Version         : 3.6.1-1
   Upstream Author : Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm>
 * URL             : https://github.com/joostkremers/writeroom-mode
 * License         : BSD-3-clause
   Section         : lisp

It will be maintained in the pkg-emacsen project:

    ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/writeroom-mode.git

It builds this binary package:

    elpa-writeroom-mode - Minor mode for distraction-free writing

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

    https://mentors.debian.net/package/writeroom-mode

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/writeroom-mode/writeroom-mode_3.6.1-1.dsc

And here is changelog:

writeroom-mode (3.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Initial release. (Closes: #861124)
  * Add 0001-Use-Texinfo-format-for-directory-declaration-for-inf.patch
    and 0002-Fix-menu-entry-in-texi-before-body.patch
    and 0003-Increase-header-levels-of-customisation-options-in-R.patch
    - These are needed to fix a variety of issues with the info file,
      including the lintian error "info-document-missing-dir-entry".

 -- Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>  Wed, 03 May 2017 15:52:36 -0400

Do the headers for the patches I cherry-picked (one manual 3-way
merge) from upstream look ok?  Specifically I'm wondering if I should
use the "Applied-Upstream: commit hash" or "Applied-Upstream: commit:
hash".  I chose the former.

Cheers,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: