[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]



On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:16:21PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Branden,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:28:25PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > You are very unlikely to get release team approval for this upload as it
> > > stands.  Given what you wrote in #511645, is your intention for xtrs to
> > > drop out of stretch, to be reintroduced in buster?
> > 
> > I've been making conservative (pessimistic) estimates about how fast I'd
> > be getting things done since I'm freshly back to the project after a
> > long absence.  There were and are best practices I need(ed) to get
> > caught up on.  I also couldn't be absolutely sure I'd get a sponsor
> > before the removal-from-testing date (scheduled for 11 April); I don't
> > know when I'll be able to get my new GPG key into the Debian keyring so
> > that I can upload under my own power[1], and so forth.  Finally, I don't
> > want to cause the release team any trouble.
> > 
> > So my goals were, in this order:
> > 1) Get the package suitable for unstable (which it wasn't); then
> > 2) Get the package suitable for testing.
> 
> Generally speaking, something shouldn't go into unstable unless it would
> also be suitable for testing (once deps and r-deps are also ready to
> migrate).

It'll be suitable for testing for Buster, that's for sure.  My bad luck
to return during a release freeze.

I'm interested in the least-effort solution (for other people) that
doesn't involve shipping a badly broken package in Stretch.

-- 
Regards,
Branden

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: