[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#856652: marked as done (RFS: xpdf/3.04.real-5 [ITA])

Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:09:36 -0700
with message-id <20170312150936.63fmfugh5qgb6m5k@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#856652: RFS: xpdf/3.04.real-5 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #856652,
regarding RFS: xpdf/3.04.real-5 [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
856652: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856652
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my ITA package "xpdf"

 * Package name    : xpdf
   Version         : 3.0.4.real-4

Changelog entry:
xpdf (3.04.real-4) experimental; urgency=medium

  * New maintainer (Closes: #848631)
  * Build using the correct upstream tarball xpdf-3.04.tar.gz.

 -- Svante Signell <svante.signell@gmail.com>  Fri, 03 Mar 2017 08:53:33 +0100

The files should be available at:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf
but is not yet. However uploading was successful:
dput mentors xpdf_3.04.real-4_amd64.changes

(By mistake I did a dput without the mentors tag. Since that upload is only
allowed for Debian developers I assume these files will be removed).

Thanks!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
control: tag -1 +wontfix -moreinfo

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 06:43:30PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Orphaning does not mean that a package is unmaintainable.  As I've
> stated elsewhere I will continue to be willing to help, and that
> includes if it doesn't get adopted, which is far preferable than the
> dialog seen here so far.  It is up for adoption because I don't want
> to be the only one responsible anymore.

Thank you for your reply!  I take it that you disagree with Svante's
judgement that the libpoppler version is unmaintainable.  It's good to
hear that things are not hopeless.

I'm closing this RFS for now.  If someone wants to adopt the libpoppler
version of xpdf, or do a QA upload, they could reopen it.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: