On 03/08/2017 02:29 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote: > I understand that tarballs are important and could greatly reduce extra works. Well, it's relatively trivial to assemble a tarball. So I think of it more as a sign of upstream's quality awareness (or lack thereof). But well... > Fgrun is really important for flightgear Is it? There's an integrated starter or plane selector, now. And personally, I haven't ever really used fgrun. But that's just a tiny datapoint. Popcon says: 688 installs of flightgear vs 201 of fgrun > and we should not leave it behind, so > I made some investigations. Thanks. > Good news: one of flightgear devs set up a mirror on GitHub and sync every 15 > minutes. If you don't mind using a (frequently synchronized) mirror as d/watch > upstream, we could switch watch target onto GitHub (with proper tarball > support) and update files in this RFS and/or Alioth Git repo. What do you > think? Yes, that sound's feasible to me. Kind Regards Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature