[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#855355: marked as done (RFS: nasm/2.12.02-1 [ITA])

Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <665435280.1555768.1487317821068@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#855355: RFS: nasm/2.12.02-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #855355,
regarding RFS: nasm/2.12.02-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
855355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855355
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: low

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nasm"

 Package name    : nasm
 Version         : 2.12.02-1
 Upstream Author : "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
 URL             : http://www.nasm.us/
 License         : BSD-2-clause
 Section         : devel

It builds those binary packages:

  nasm  - General-purpose x86 assembler

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/nasm


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nasm/nasm_2.12.02-1.dsc

I have made the packaging available in git under collab-maint:

https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/nasm.git/

Changes since the last upload:

nasm (2.12.02-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream version 2.12.02

-Jordan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
>also here, you can't "ITA" something that is not orphaned.


your changelog misses some things, e.g. bump of standard version,
and also you might try to bump debhelper compat level too (for a next upload)

side note: the reproducible patch might be changed in something little different
-const char nasm_date[] = __DATE__;

+const char nasm_date[] = __DATE_DEBIAN__;

and then use dpkg-parsechangelog to feed that value on CFLAGS
this way you will get the date from the latest changelog entry.

the package might benefit from the new dh sequencer :)

anyway, sponsored!
(please be more verbose, many people looks at changelogs when installing stuff!)

G.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: