Updated packaging : https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rear/rear_2.00+dfsg-1.dsc Hello Andreas, thanks for having a look at the packaging and letting me know for asciidoc. Indeed, the move is interesting and asciidoc-base seems enough for the generation of the documentation. Other fixes : - I changed d/watch because +dfsg was not correctly handled and a new version was detected upstream whereas it shouldn't. - I fixed a forgotten lintian "manpage-has-errors-from-man" caused by a too long line. - I fixed accents in my name. F. On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:56:16 +0100, Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se> wrote: > Hello Frederic Bonnard, > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:28:19AM +0100, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear mentors, Gianfranco, > > first best wishes to you all for this new year, health, success ; > > especially in you Debian area :) . > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rear". > > This is an upgrade to previous 1.19 and it fixes a FTBFS bug. Extract from d/changelog : > > > > rear (2.00+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > * New upstream release > > * d/control : move asciidoc to Build-Depends (Closes: #849303) > > > > -- Frédéric Bonnard <frediz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:12:34 +0100 > [...] > > Given asciidoc was recently restructured with a new package split and > the asciidoc package itself became a meta-package shouldn't you also > take this opportunity to switch your build-dep to something else, like > possibly asciidoc-base? > > (Not sure exactly what your needs are and which one of the asciidoc > packages is suitable for you. The rear-doc package only seems to contain > html files though and the asciidoc-base package description makes me > think that's the suitable one.) > > Regards, > Andreas Henriksson >
Attachment:
pgpZdSbUVSyFq.pgp
Description: PGP signature