[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#850422: Are you sure you want to upload a release candidate of a new version of h5py?



On Sat, 2017-01-07 at 07:52 +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> 
> Lumin, can you please check caffe*?

I think caffe-* are safe. Since searching h5py in the upstream
code with ack yields the following result (the result is
stripped by me):

```
$ ack -i h5py

examples/brewing-logreg.ipynb
33:    "import h5py\n",
147:    "with h5py.File(train_filename, 'w') as f:\n",
156:    "with h5py.File(test_filename, 'w') as f:\n",

python/requirements.txt
7:h5py>=2.2.0

src/caffe/test/test_data/generate_sample_data.py
6:import h5py
34:with h5py.File(script_dir + '/sample_data.h5', 'w') as f:
39:with h5py.File(script_dir + '/sample_data_2_gzip.h5', 'w') as f:
76:with h5py.File(script_dir + '/solver_data.h5', 'w') as f:
```

HDF5 is just an alternative input data format for Caffe. If users
are able to correctly read and write their HDF5 image database
with the new version of h5py, then things are expected to go well
-- in this case there is nothing to do with caffe-*.


Reply to: