[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#832704: marked as done (RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client)



Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:54:01 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <2023750558.5647606.1479495241473@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#832704: RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client
has caused the Debian Bug report #832704,
regarding RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta10+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
832704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832704
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nixnote2"

* Package name    : nixnote2
  Version         : 2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1
  Upstream Author : Randy Baumgarte <randy@fbn.cx>
* URL             : http://nevernote.sourceforge.net/
* License         : GPL-2
  Section         : utils

It builds those binary packages:

    nixnote2 - Open Source Evernote client

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

    https://mentors.debian.net/package/nixnote2

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nixnote2/nixnote2_2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1.dsc

Alternatively, one can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:

    https://github.com/hosiet/nixnote2.git

Regards,
Boyuan Yang

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, I put the package in deferred/5, because I'm not sure about the whole license.
Isn't it something like GPL-2+ instead of GPL-2?
I agree single files are ok, but the "*" wildcard seems a GPL-2+ to me, even if
I didn't find a copying file.

Can you please clarify?

thanks you both for the really nice work!


G.

Attachment: pgpA4F2J3iXUn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: