Bug#841228: marked as done (RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-1 [ITP] -- picklable reimplementation of Python's itertools)
Your message dated Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:48:25 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1084957017.145805.1478072905803@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#841228: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-1 [ITP] -- picklable reimplementation of Python's itertools
has caused the Debian Bug report #841228,
regarding RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-1 [ITP] -- picklable reimplementation of Python's itertools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
841228: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841228
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-1 [ITP] -- picklable reimplementation of Python's itertools
- From: Fabian Wolff <fabi.wolff@arcor.de>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:23:58 +0200
- Message-id: <20161018172358.pskhhn6rrmj4x4mk@localhost.localdomain>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-picklable-itertools":
* Package name : python-picklable-itertools
Version : 0.1.1-1
Upstream Author : David Warde-Farley <d.warde.farley@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/mila-udem/picklable-itertools
* License : Expat
Section : python
This package is a dependency for blocks (#835865).
It builds those binary packages:
python3-picklable-itertools - picklable reimplementation of Python's itertools
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-picklable-itertools
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-picklable-itertools/python-picklable-itertools_0.1.1-1.dsc
Regards,
Fabian Wolff
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Fabian Wolff <fabi.wolff@arcor.de>, <841228-done@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#841228: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-1 [ITP] -- picklable reimplementation of Python's itertools
- From: Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:48:25 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <1084957017.145805.1478072905803@mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>
- In-reply-to: <20161025174601.bmmvheq24ovetal6@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20161018172358.pskhhn6rrmj4x4mk@localhost.localdomain> <369987385.1480227.1477245725744@mail.yahoo.com> <20161025174601.bmmvheq24ovetal6@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
>> just a question, why aren't you packaging the Python2 version?
>> (the question is that I would like to avoid another binNEW queue in case some
>> other people asks for it)>In this document
> https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-python3.html
>it says
> "Programs should use Python 3, and should not be packaged for Python 2 as well."
>On rereading it, though, I realized that this only applies to Python
>programs, whereas the rules are less strict for Python libraries.
sure, because a program can't use both, and the 3 version is preferred in that case.
but libraries are so much different, they are created to be used by other
programs
>I have added a Python 2 package and reuploaded the package to
>Mentors.
and sponsored.
Just a side note:
how do you feel about this watch file?
http://pypi.debian.net/picklable-itertools/watch
G.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: