[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#839859: marked as done (RFS: poppassd/1.8.5-4.1 [RC, NMU])



Your message dated Thu, 6 Oct 2016 03:20:27 +0200
with message-id <20161006012027.GA24236@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#839859: RFS: poppassd/1.8.5-4.1 [RC, NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #839859,
regarding RFS: poppassd/1.8.5-4.1 [RC, NMU]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
839859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the attached NMU of poppassd that
resolves an FTBFS [1] due to an obsolete debhelper compat level.

I have contacted the maintainer of poppassd five weeks ago [2] with
a proposal addressing the numerous QA issues, including a new upstream
release that fixes an ambiguous MIT/GPL license and uses autoconf.
Unfortunately the maintainer has not replied so far. The maintainer
has not responded to the RC bug either, which was filed in March.

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/817626
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/836008

Following advice from Ricardo Mones on behalf of the Debian MIA team,
I am submitting a minimal NMU for upload to DELAYED/7 that addresses
only the RC bug. After the NMU has been accepted without a reply from
the maintainer, I will request sponsorship for poppassd/1.8.7-1 [3] to
address the QA issues (see lintian warnings).

[3] https://bugs.debian.org/836008#10

Regards,
Peter
--- a/debian/control
--- b/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: mail
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Adam Conrad <adconrad@0c3.net>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libpam-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), libpam-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: poppassd
--- a/debian/changelog
--- b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+poppassd (1.8.5-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Bump debhelper compat level to 9 (Closes: #817626)
+
+ -- Peter Colberg <peter@colberg.org>  Wed, 05 Oct 2016 07:55:06 -0400
+
 poppassd (1.8.5-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Merge change from Ubuntu to depend on an inetd (closes: #520243)
--- a/debian/compat
--- b/debian/compat
@@ -1 +1 @@
-4
+9

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:02:58PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the attached NMU of poppassd that
> resolves an FTBFS [1] due to an obsolete debhelper compat level.
[...]
> Following advice from Ricardo Mones on behalf of the Debian MIA team,
> I am submitting a minimal NMU for upload to DELAYED/7 that addresses
> only the RC bug. After the NMU has been accepted without a reply from
> the maintainer, I will request sponsorship for poppassd/1.8.7-1 [3] to
> address the QA issues (see lintian warnings).

Sounds like a reasonable plan.

I've put your upload into DELAYED/7, let's see what happens.

Thanks for taking care for this package.


Meow!
-- 
A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, 1kg
raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month.  Filter out and
throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, etc), let the drink age
at least 3-6 months.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: