Bug#777651: RFS: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
>remove gcc,
>let sdl 1.2 (remove unused sdl2)
>update versions from unstable
oh... no sdl2 ready code?
>>fixed.
>>i only can test in these archs, but i changed it to => any
>
>Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libsdl1.2 (>= 1.2.15)
libsdl1.2 explicit runtime dependency might be "droppable", did you test it?
just do a build, and open the deb file section debian/control
why libsdl1.2 is not picked up?
>> some (most) of them looks like embedded libraries
>
>it's part of uptream source. can i do something to make it better?
>
yes, remove them, repack the source (debian/copyright has a nice Files-Excluded feature)
and drop them from copyright.
and package them separately if not yet in debian (and useful outside this package)
>http://cvs.synchro.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/src/sbbs3/zmodem.h?revision=1.54&view=markup
>
>Unfortunately, this was after 1.0 release date, and it was made through
>my work to contact everyone involved and good response from them.
ok, you might package an upstream snapshot, or clarify this in copyright file
>I think that can parse file by file to fine copyright settings.
>i update it, please check,
>I want to the package fit the debian legal requeriments, the code is
>gpl, lgpl and some files bsd. i think that all are dfsg
>The non-dfsg part was cryplib and was removed via patch (the app can be
>used without that lib)
ok
let me know how you want to proceed with the above points
cheers,
G.
Reply to: