On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 08:51 +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > >There's a typo in the man page patch (standa instead of stanza). The typo got fixed after he uploaded the patch. > It's good to have this function in the core, but doesn't that exclude backports? There were dpkg backports in the past, so not necessarily. > Just out of curiosity: could you please describe a use case for this? None were mentioned on IRC, a C:field for changelog fields was just a thought. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part