Bug#827590: RFS: lua-torch-trepl/0~20160613-g06128f9-1 [ITP]
Hi,
>This is due to, actually "trepl" doesn't B-D on the "lua-torch-torch7-dev"
>package. It is a runtime dependency. I'll leave a comment there.
>Keeping this runtime B-D there because it declares explicit dependency
>relationship.
oh, ok
>I've thought about spliting it up -- inspece verbose dh build and
>extract the library compilation commands into d/rules -- however this
>makes d/rules complicated with hardcoded compiles.
>
>Seems that dh_lua didn't foresee such a demand, so the above method is
>the way first came up in my mind.
>
>Now that the symlink just works fine ...
>
>1. split then up with hardcoded compile
>2. create a new package that ships just a simlink
>
>How do you like it?
no, seems worse. lets keep it
>Suggests: lua-torch-dok, lua-torch-xlua
they need to be packaged first.
G.
--
Best,
Lumin
Reply to: