Bug#833100: RFS: python-schema/0.6.2-1 [ITP]

To: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
Cc: 833100@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#833100: RFS: python-schema/0.6.2-1 [ITP]
From: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:10:30 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] CAFzxpWp1OPDGpa2QScjpfu-kHoVSRxtWGU+3zVh3XsH6N8RVJg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>, 833100@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1600392794.13103591.1470042089575.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <578015c1-cb65-b3af-2454-4c28ae36d4d9@gmail.com> <1600392794.13103591.1470042089575.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>

2016-08-01 10:01 GMT+01:00 Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>:

control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo

>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-schema"

looks good to me, just a few typo in the source
occured ==> occurred

Forwarded upstream here:

https://github.com/keleshev/schema/pull/115

Is it worth keeping a patch downstream for such a trivial fix?

Ghis

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#833100: RFS: python-schema/0.6.2-1 [ITP]
  - From: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#833100: marked as done (RFS: python-schema/0.6.2-1 [ITP])
Next by Date: Bug#833100: RFS: python-schema/0.6.2-1 [ITP]
Previous by thread: Bug#833100: marked as done (RFS: python-schema/0.6.2-1 [ITP])
Next by thread: Bug#833100: RFS: python-schema/0.6.2-1 [ITP]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread