Bug#832246: marked as done (RFS: cligh/0.2-5 )
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:39:06 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <284713961.11060913.1469774346510.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#832814: RFS: cligh/0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #832246,
regarding RFS: cligh/0.2-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
832246: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832246
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cligh"
* Package name : cligh
Version : 0.2-5
Upstream Author : Christopher M. Brannon <chris@the-brannons.com>
* Url : http://the-brannons.com/software/cligh.html
* Licenses : GPL-3+, BSD-3-clause
Section : utils
It builds those binary packages:
cligh -- Command-line interface to GitHub
To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/cligh
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cligh/cligh_0.2-5.dsc
Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/cligh.git
More information about cligh can be obtained from http://the-brannons.com/software/cligh.html
Changes since last upload:
* Change section to 'utils'
Regards,
Dmitry Bogatov
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cligh"
I sponsored it, but please for next time remember to delete non-uploaded
releases in changelog (talking about 0.2-5)
and you can reuse already ongoing RFS bug, no need to open a new one each time :)
G.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: