[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#832556: RFS: wvstreams/4.6.1-10 [QA, RC]



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for the package "wvstreams"

 * Package name    : wvstreams
   Version         : 4.6.1-10
   Upstream Author : Net Integration Technologies Inc. et al. 
 * URL             : https://github.com/apenwarr/wvstreams/
 * License         : LGPL-2.1 
   Section         : libs

It builds those binary packages:

 libuniconf4.6 - C++ network libraries for rapid application 
                 development
 libwvstreams-dev - Development libraries and header files for 
                    libwvstreams4.6
 libwvstreams4.6-base - C++ network libraries for rapid application 
                        development
 libwvstreams4.6-doc - Documentation for WvStreams
 libwvstreams4.6-extras - C++ network libraries for rapid application 
                          development
 uniconf-tools - Tools to interface with UniConf
 uniconfd   - Server that manages UniConf elements

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/wvstreams


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

 dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wvstreams/wvstre
ams_4.6.1-10.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * d/p/gcc-6: Update patch to fix more restrictive interpretation of
    the standard by g++-6, Closes: #831146

Note with the upload of Version 4.6.1-9 Gianfranco pointed out to me
that it would be nice to update to dh-autoreconf too. However, on one
hand the package uses nested configure scripts, and I don't know how
this should be handled, and on the other hand, the build scripts
already calls autoheader and autoconf and manually copies the system
versions of config.sub and config.guess. 

In order to not introduce new bugs I prefer to just fix the RC bug and
not change the build system to use dh-autoreconf (I actually tried, but
it didn't really work out).

many thanks,
Gert


Reply to: