[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind



Hi there,

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 at 22:19:06 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 at 22:30:18 -0400, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
>> Guilhem Moulin <guilhem@guilhem.org> writes:
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"
>>
>> This looks like a well-Debianized package to me.
>> […]
>> I also want to make you aware of the Let's Encrypt Debain Packaging
>> Team, in case you were interested in having the package be co-maintained
>> with us (with the team in Uploaders), or maintained under that heading
>> entirely (with the team in Maintainer).
> 
> Although you didn't take Bug Ownership, did I understand correctly that
> you or your fellow team members might be interested in sponsoring this
> upload?  No hurries, I'm just wondering if I should poke the list again
> in two weeks or so ;-)

Alright, I take the lack of response as a “no”.  (Dropping letsencrypt-
devel@l.a.d.o from the CC.)  I am therefore still in need for a sponsor
for my package lacme, so please allow me to bump the thread in the d-m
archives :-)

    https://bugs.debian.org/827425

Cheers,
-- 
Guilhem.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: