Bug#829571: marked as done (RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.3+ds-1 -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method)
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <179381224.3384490.1467707677696.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829571: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.3+ds-1 -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method
has caused the Debian Bug report #829571,
regarding RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.3+ds-1 -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
829571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829571
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Sponsors,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package gmp-ecm [1], a mathematical
library that Factor[s] integers using the Elliptic Curve Method'. This package
brings the lasted patch release of [gmp-]ecm.
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gmp-ecm.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
> I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package gmp-ecm [1], a mathematical
> library that Factor[s] integers using the Elliptic Curve Method'. This package
> brings the lasted patch release of [gmp-]ecm.
done
G.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: