Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP

[Dmitry Bogatov <KAction@gnu.org>]

> 1. In d/copyright, the license should be called "Expat" not "MIT" since
>    "MIT" is ambiguous between several different licenses.

Is it true? AFAIC, there are 3 versions of BSD (2,3,4 clauses) and only
one MIT.

> 2. evil-paredit.el declares a dependency on paredit version "25beta".
>    But we have version 24 in Debian.[1]  Have you tested that it works with
>    paredit 24?  I have noticed that the current generation of Elisp
>    hackers declare dependencies newer than they actually need so maybe
>    we are in luck.

Relaxed dependency. Works for me.

-- 
Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff
Accept-Language: eo,en,ru
X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io