[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#828996: marked as done (RFS: ripole/0.2.0+20081101.0215-2 [QA])



Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:35:07 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <259888311.6066244.1467218107804.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828996: RFS: ripole/0.2.0+20081101.0215-2 [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #828996,
regarding RFS: ripole/0.2.0+20081101.0215-2 [QA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
828996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ripole"

 * Package name    : ripole
   Version         : 0.2.0+20081101.0215-2
   Upstream Author : Paul L Daniels <pldaniels@pldaniels.com>
 * URL             : http://www.pldaniels.com/ripole/
 * License         : BSD-4-Clause
   Section         : utils

It builds those binary packages:

  ripole     - Extract attachments from OLE2 data files (ie, MS Office docs)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/ripole


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/ripole/ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-2.dsc

More information about ripole can be obtained from http://www.pldaniels.com/ripole/.

Changes since the last upload:

  * QA upload.
  * Set maintainer to QA group
  * Updated to source format 3.0 (quilt) (Closes: #664296)
  * Updated debhelper level to 9
  * Drop build-dep on dpatch
  * Added unused_variable.patch
    - FTBFS with debhelper 9 due to variable set but not used
  * Converted copyright to DEP-5


Regards,
  David William Richmond Jones

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,


>Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ripole"

uploaded

(BTW I don't like in general dropping shlibs:Depends, it might introduce mistakes when
the package gains new dependencies)


thanks!

G.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: