Bug#828104: marked as done (RFS: sollya/5.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- library for safe floating-point code development)
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:29:53 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1376916126.5549866.1467192593411.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#828104: RFS: sollya/5.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- library for safe floating-point code development
has caused the Debian Bug report #828104,
regarding RFS: sollya/5.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- library for safe floating-point code development
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
828104: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828104
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Sponsors,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package sollya [1], an
advanced numnerical tool which comes with an interactive interface
and a library. It targets floatting-point code development.
This package was packaged on behalf of the Debian Science Team.
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
[1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/sollya.git
-- System Information:
Debian Release: Jessie*
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt20-0001-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
done!
>Indeed. I was surprised as well. It appears that the provided library
>is a wrapping library but not a core library.
ok
>This is a mistake of mine: the *-dev was meant to the libsollya-dev package:
>I have just corrected it.
ok
>I have just attempted to break the circles of suggestions by introducing Enhances fields.
I still don't get why
"Conflicts: libsollya"
and also the Pre-Depends can be dropped post wheezy
>> 4) debian GPL-3, * is CeCILL-C
>>
>> this makes difficult to forward patches upstream
>
>What do you suggest ?
use the same upstream license.
>Sorry I do not get your point here.
>My first reaction was: they are free to do so.
yes, indeed, but why mention a license that is not used in the package?
>I think it is ok: where could there exist an issue ?
nowhere :)
I just don't like too much the foreign multiarch tag, so I have to check carefully for it
cheers,
Gianfranco
--- End Message ---
Reply to: