Bug#827685: marked as done (RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP)
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2016 06:39:07 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1022664362.10005142.1466404747728.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#827685: RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #827685,
regarding RFS: elpa-undo-tree/0.6.4-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
827685: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827685
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpa-undo-tree"
* Package name : elpa-undo-tree
Version : 0.6.4-1
Upstream Author : Toby Cubitt <toby-undo-tree@dr-qubit.org>
* Url : http://www.dr-qubit.org/git/undo-tree.git
* Licenses : GPL-3+
Section : lisp
It builds those binary packages:
elpa-undo-tree -- Emacs minor mode for handling undo history as tree
To access futher information about this package, visit the following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/elpa-undo-tree
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/elpa-undo-tree/elpa-undo-tree_0.6.4-1.dsc
Alternatively, you can access package debian/ directory via git from URL:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/paredit-el.git
More information about elpa-undo-tree can be obtained from http://www.dr-qubit.org/git/undo-tree.git
Changes since last upload:
* Initial release. (Closes: #827679)
Regards,
Dmitry Bogatov
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
>As a member of the Emacs packaging team, I've had a look at this, and it
>seems fine. Thanks Dmitry.
I did a really quick look, signed and uploaded!
thanks you both
G.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: